On 24 December 2025, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court held that availing a RERA remedy does not, by the doctrine of election, bar a buyer from seeking interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act — the remedies are contemporaneous where the reliefs do not overlap.
In 1953 a three-judge bench laid the foundation of Indian frustration doctrine, holding that Section 56 of the Contract Act is a complete code, that 'impossibility' means impracticability striking at the root of the contract, and that a temporary war requisition did not frustrate a no-fixed-time development contract.
On 13 February 2025, a two-judge bench held that the award of interest under Section 34 CPC is an equitable, discretionary relief and denied interest on a refunded principal because the claimant had engaged in forum shopping and procedural abuse.