Two airlines control nearly 90% of the Indian domestic aviation market. A complainant alleged that their identical cancellation-charge structures were anti-competitive — collusion under Section 3, abuse of dominance under Section 4, or both. The Competition Commission of India closed the matter under Section 26(2) on the ground that no prima facie case had been made out. A digest of the reasoning, the threshold standard, and what the disposition reveals about the CCI's contemporary posture in consumer-pricing complaints.