Tagged “oppression-and-mismanagement”

Purushothaman Thitta v. Pothan Rajan (2026): why company restructuring and shareholder oppression are not arbitrable

The Kerala High Court held that a claim to restructure companies and divide their assets under a private MOU falls within the NCLT's exclusive jurisdiction under Sections 241–242 of the Companies Act, 2013, and is non-arbitrable. A digest of the facts, the Vidya Drolia / Booz Allen arbitrability test, and the Court's use of Article 227.