The Supreme Court held that the addition for future prospects cannot be refused merely because the victim's income was notional rather than proved. Applying the Pranay Sethi percentages to a homemaker's notional income, the Court underscored the economic value of domestic work.
The Supreme Court, following Reliance General Insurance v. Shashi Sharma, held that compassionate financial assistance under the Haryana Rules of 2006 — which replicates the deceased employee's pay and wages — must be deducted from the loss-of-income component of a Motor Vehicles Act dependency award, because allowing both would be an impermissible double benefit. Genuinely collateral receipts such as life insurance and family pension remain non-deductible under Helen C. Rebello.